- For simplicity, if we assume that the turbulent boundary layer grows from the leading edge of the plate we shall be able to apply the boundary conditions x = 0, δ = 0 which will yieldC = 0, and Eq. (34.30) will become From Eqs (34.26b), (34.28) and (34.31), it is possible to calculate the average skin friction coefficient on a flat plate as
From Eqs (34.26b), (34.28) and (34.31), it is possible to calculate the average skin friction coefficient on a flat plate as
| | (34.32) |
It can be shown that Eq. (34.32) predicts the average skin friction coefficient correctly in the regime of Reynolds number below .
This result is found to be in good agreement with the experimental results in the range of Reynolds number between and which is given by
| | (34.33) |
Equation (34.33) is a widely accepted correlation for the average value of turbulent skin friction coefficient on a flat plate.
- With the help of Nikuradse's experiments, Schlichting obtained the semi empirical equation for the average skin friction coefficient as
| | (34.34) |
Equation (34.34) was derived asssuming the flat plate to be completely turbulent over its entire length . In reality, a portion of it is laminar from the leading edge to some downstream position. For this purpose, it was suggested to use
| | (34.35a) |
where A has various values depending on the value of Reynolds number at which the transition takes place.
- If the trasition is assumed to take place around a Reynolds number of , the average skin friction correlation of Schlichling can be written as
| | (34.35b) |
All that we have presented so far, are valid for a smooth plate.
- Schlichting used a logarithmic expression for turbulent flow over a rough surface and derived
| | (34.36) |
|